With a full frame equivalent 24mm focal length, the XF 16mm f/2.8 is perfect for shooting travel and landscape photos while on the go. This lens also fills in nicely for candid people photos and a little street photography. The XF 16mm f/2.8 isnāt as fast as Fujiās 16mm f/1.4, but it is nearly 8oz lighter, $600 cheaper, and is an overall
This Fuji 16-80mm is a general-purpose zoom. It goes a little wider and longer than the smaller 18-55mm f/2.8-4, but this 16-80mm is bigger and more expensive. It's made of metal and plastic. This 16-80mm is super sharp, as almost all lenses are today, and it also gets very close, probably replacing a macro lens for most people.
The Fujifilm 16mm f/2.8 is a great little lens because it's all-metal, inexpensive, compact, extremely well made with engraved markings and of course it's super sharp. If you want a fixed lens that sees the same angle-of-view on Fujifilm's APS-C X-mount cameras as a 24mm wide-angle sees on full-frame, this is it.
Yes, the 16-80 was never "Fuji Sharp", at least in my opinion. And this was on the X-H1. The performance on my early copy was so poor that I sent it back to Fuji for inspection/repair, and the repaired version was not much better. It is curious that Fuji is selling the 16-80 as a kit lens with the X-T5.
The Lee Filter system would provided for a 15 stop ND with both their ' Stopper' range and their 'ProGlass IRND' range . However, you would be looking at their 100mm system rather than their 'SevenFive' system due to the 77mm adaptor requirement for the 16-55mm. I have a few Hoya Solas IRND ND filters of various thread sizes, and density.
. p.1 #14 Ā· p.1 #14 Ā· 18-55mm F2.8-4 vs 16-80mm F4. Tim Carpenter wrote: I've been looking for a current evaluation of these lenses and especially if the early issues (seemed firmware related) with the 16-80mm have been resolved. I like the reach of the 16-80 as it aligns well with the 24-105,, I had with my FF Canon DSLR.
Fujifilmās XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR is one of Fujifilmās attempts to pull working professionals over to the system with high-quality versatile lens offerings. Not everyone shoots with small fast prime lenses, and many working professionals rely day-in-day-out on their standard and telephoto zoom lenses to get the job done. The 16-55mmF2.8 is just that - a standard zoom that gets the job done
The 16-55 maxes out at 73lpmm@f/4.0 where the 23 f/1.4 maxes out 70lpmm@f/5.6. So from a resolution point of view, the 16-55 outperforms the 23 f/1.4. The 16-55 also has a very fast AF. It is heavier but no heavier that the lenses it replaces. Like the 23 f/1.4, there is no OIS.
From samples, the Sigma has more color fringing and the bokeh isn't as nice, while the Sony 16-55 has almost no fringing in most situations. The 16-55 is also better sealed, and has more physical controls. However, it is pretty heavy (although not uncomfortably so) and is obviously a lot more expensive.
The XF 8-16mm is a premium, wide aperture, ultra-wide-angle zoom lens that completes Fujiās trinity of fast aperture zoom lenses (along with the Fuji 16-55mm F2.8 and 50-140mm F2.8 lenses). At nearly $2000 USD in price, the XF 8-16mm isnāt for everyone, but it does offer an extremely competent option for wedding, portrait, and event
fuji 16 55 f2 8 review
